Total cleanup time for most of the beaches hit by the initial spill was about 45 days, although globs of tar continued to wash ashore due to the high rate from the sea-bed fissures, and bigger patches came ashore during subsequent spills. Most beaches were open to the public by June 1, although some of the rocky areas on the shore were not cleaned until around August 15. Still, oil continued to pool and wash up on shore. On August 26th, 1969, the harbor was so full of oil that once again it had to be closed, with cleanup crews spreading straw from boats to bunch the oil up again, just as they had six months earlier. And in December 1969, another spill occurred at the Union Oil lease – this one from a underwater pipeline serving Platform A. A 50-square-mile slick formed before the break in the pipeline was detected. The pipeline was equipped with automatic pressure-reduction devices and shut-off systems supposed to guard against such failures. But none of those safeguards functioned at time. The second spill was most conspicuous at Carpinteria State Beach and Hobson County Park. Generally out in the Channel and ocean, oil from the main spill would persist into 1970, with large areas of crude still being observed at that time.
Economic losses resulting from the spill were difficult to estimate, but some figures did become available. In 1969, the tourist industry suffered considerably, but did recover in subsequent years. A class-action lawsuit awarded nearly $6.5 million to owners of beachfront homes, apartments, hotels, and motels. Commercial and recreational boat owners and nautical suppliers were awarded $1.3 million for property damage and loss of revenue. Commercial fishers lost access to some fisheries temporarily. Union Oil also settled a lawsuit filed by the State of California, County of Santa Barbara, and the towns of Santa Barbara and Carpinteria in the amount of $9.5 million for loss of property.
New Kind of “Due Process”
Still, in the years following the Santa Barbara oil spill of 1969, as state and federal authorities put into practice environmental protection policies, a new kind of “environmental due process” began to take hold. Major projects and decision making by government and business that could affect the environment were now dealt with differently. Impacts and possible alternatives were weighed and considered before approvals could be given – with all decisions made after public hearings and comment. The Santa Barbara Channel wasn’t the immediate beneficiary of these fundamental changes in environmental consideration. Indeed, more drilling rigs went in. In the years following the Santa Barbara oil spill, as the new laws kicked in, an “environmental due proc- ess” began to take hold… In Santa Barbara and elsewhere, it took time for the machinery of “environmental due process” to begin working. But gradually it did take hold – and it was a major change in thinking and foresight. New leases and/or drilling rig proposals had to be evaluated for their total environmental impact and some could be prohibited. Highway builders could no longer level urban communities for a freeway; untreated sewage or chemicals could not longer be discharged into rivers and streams; automakers had to equip cars with catalytic converters to clean up smog-causing exhausts; more wilderness areas, marine mammals, and wildlife were given protection. The environment was accorded new “standing,” both in the legal and lay sense of that term; it was not longer a “free” medium for polluters or exploiters; it was given a higher value and put on a more even footing with purely economic decisions and/or government dictums. And before long, environmental values and environmental protection would work their way into the earliest R&D stages of product development and even factory design and plant location siting. Even at the earliest stages of product invention and capital goods planning, protecting the environment became a consideration. Still, to this day, there are too many products, projects, and technologies that do not have before-the-fact environmental protection and life-cycle analysis built into them. All the more reason to push ahead with the fights that began in 1969 and 1970 at Santa Barbara, along the Cuyahoga River, and in the halls of the U.S. Congress.
See also at this website, “Environmental History,” a topics page with links to additional stories covering environmental issues. Thanks for visiting – and if you like what you find here, please make a donation to help support the research and writing at this website. Thank you. – Jack Doyle
Date Posted: 22 February 2016
Last Update: 11 March 2016
Comments to: email@example.com
Jack Doyle, “Santa Barbara Oil Spill: California, 1969,”
PopHistoryDig.com, February 22, 2016.
Sources, Links & Additional Information
|1969: Close up of Union Oil rig and the roiling surface waters from escaping oil & gas on the sea-bed below.
|Feb 11th, 1969: Part of the daily coverage the Los Angeles Times newspaper ran during the Santa Barbara oil spill.
|1969: Aerial photo of Union Oil rig after the blowout. Eventually, an 800-square-mile slick formed.
|Feb 6th, 1969: The Telegram-Tribune of San Luis Obispo reporting on the "miles of black ooze" that hit the beaches.
|1969: Associated Press photo of workers raking up straw used to absorb some of the crude oil that came ashore from the Union Oil blowout.
|1969: Life magazine photo of workers steam-cleaning oil stained rocks at Carpinteria, CA.
|1969: Volunteers working to save oiled sea bird following Santa Barbara spill. Telegram-Tribune, San Luis Obispo.
|1969: Life magazine photo of oil-splotched sea lion and cub on San Miguel Island off coast. Photo, Harry Benson.
|Feb 7, 1969: Sample of newspaper headlines used across the country during the Santa Barbara oil spill-- this one from the La Crosse Tribune in Wisconsin.
|July 1969: Study of the Santa Barbara oil spill commissioned by the U.S. Department of the Interior and the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration. Click for PDF file.
|1969: Santa Barbara citizen displays his "dead sea" placard during oil spill protest gathering.
|Various lawsuits were filed over the Santa Barbara spill in 1969, but most were not settled until several years later. This Associated Press story of July 1974 reports on one of those outcomes.
|One of a number of studies on the Santa Barbara oil spill that would appear in the years following the spill, this one published in 1972 by the Institute on Governmental Studies at the University of California, Berkeley.
|1969: Early attempts to corral the Santa Barbara oil spill using boats and oil booms.
|1969: Santa Barbara clean-up crews “pitchforking” oil-soaked hay from corralled oil spill in harbor area. Photo, Bob Duncan.
|1969: Bulldozers formed piles of oil-soaked sand and cleanup wastes on the beaches in Santa Barbara that were hauled away to landfills by large trucks.
|1969: During oil spill cleanup in Montecito, a worker appears to be trying to retrieve something mired in the muck, possibly an oiled bird.
|1969: Life magazine photo of oil-stained boulders with oil rig on the far horizon. Boulders located at Santa Claus, south of Santa Barbara. Photo, Harry Benson.
“An Oil ‘Tide’” (photograph), Los Angeles Times, January 30, 1969, p. B-1.
Eric Malnic, “Sea Birds Killed by Oil Slick; Fight to Seal Well Leak Speeded,” Los Angeles Times, February 1, 1969, p. 1.
“Oil Slick Spreads, But Leak Slows,” New York Times, February 1, 1969, p. 32.
“Seabirds Killed by Oil,” Washington Post, February 1, 1969, p. A-6.
Harry Trimborn, “Battle Shaping Up Over Offshore Oil,” Los Angeles Times, February 2, 1969, p. 1.
Gladwin Hill, “Slick Off California Coast Revives Oil Deal Disputes,” New York Times, February. 2, 1969, p. 1
Darren Hardy, “1969 Santa Barbara Oil Spill”, UCSB.edu (includes Dick Smith photo collection, UCSB, 1969-1971).
Spencer Rich, “Oil Industry To Give Its Endorsement to Legislation on Offshore Pollution,” Washington Post, February 1969.
Robert Rawitch, Lee Dye, “Hickel Flies to Santa Barbara to Examine Offshore Oil Leak,” Los Angeles Times, February 3, 1969, pp. A1-A2.
Charles Hillinger, Dial Torgerson, “Hickel Shuts Down Drilling Operations,” Los Angeles Times, February 4, 1969, p. A1-A2.
“Santa Barbara Oil Spill,” Consortium Library.org.
“1969 Santa Barbara Oil Spill,” Wikipedia .org.
Dick Main, Dial Torgerson, “Shifting Winds Push Oil Slick Onto Santa Barbara’s Beaches,” Los Angeles Times, February 5, 1969, pp. A1-A2 .
UPI, “Pacific Oil Slick Nearer To Coast,” Lodi News-Sentinel (Lodi, California), February 5, 1969, p. 1.
“Scum Mired Birds Dying By The Hundreds,” Los Angeles Times, February 6, 1969, p. 1.
Dial Torgerson and Leonard Greenwood, “Oil Slick Damage, Bird Deaths Soar,” Los Angeles Times, February 6, 1969, p. A1-A2.
Dial Torgerson and Leonard Greenwood, “Drifting Oil Smears Beaches for 12 Miles; Scum-Mired Birds Dying by Hundreds,” Los Angeles Times, February 6, 1969, pp. 1, 3.
Warren Weaver Jr., “Senate Hearing Held,” New York Times, February 6, 1969, p. 19.
“Oil Firm Official Defends Drilling at Senate Hearing,” Los Angeles Times, February 6, 1969, p. 1.
Spencer Rich, “Hickel Assailed On Oil Policies; Hickel Scored For Not Halting Coast Oil Drills; Called ‘Tokenism;’ None in Union Parcel,” Washington Post, Times Herald, February 6, 1969, p, A-1.
Edward Weinberg, Solicitor, U.S. Department of the Interior, Memo, “Circumstances Under Which Drilling in the Santa Barbara Channel May Be Suspended,” February 1969, 2pp.
Warren Weaver, Jr., “President May Call G.I.’s To Combat Coast Oil Slick; Nixon May Use G.I.’s to Fight Oil Slick,” New York Times, February 7, 1969.
UPI, “Oil Slick Heading For L.A. Harbor; Offshore Well Still Spewing Tons of Crude,” The Desert Sun (Palm Springs, CA), February 7, 1969, p, 1.
Spencer Rich, “Stringent Rules for Drilling Promised,; Stringent Drilling Rules Pledged; No New Operations; Defends Decision…,” Washington Post, Times Herald, February 7, 1969, pp. A1-A2.
Leonard Greenwood and Eric Malnic, “Oil Seepage May Be Under Control,” Los Angeles Times, February 8, 1969, p. 1.
Spencer Rich and George Lardner, “Hickel Shuts Down Oil Operations in Leak Area,” Washington Post, Times Herald, February 8, 1969, p. 1.
George Lardner, “U.S. Waived Deeper Casing For Well Causing Oil Slick…,” Washington Post, Times Herald, February 8, 1969, p. A-1.
Harry Trimborn and Leonard Greenwood, “Oil Flow Plugged; Big Cleanup Starts,” Los Angeles Times, February 9, 1969, p. 1.
Bob Rose, “It Ruins Beaches, Smothers Lives,” Boston Globe, February 9, 1969, p. 13.
“Huge Channel Oil Spill Blows Up Storm,” Oil & Gas Journal, February 10, 1969.
George Lardner Jr., “Oil Flow Capped but Controversy Isn’t,” Washington Post, Times Herald, February 10, 1969, p. A-12.
Richard Nixon: “Statement on Coastal Oil Pollution at Santa Barbara, California.,” February 11, 1969, via Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project, USSB.edu.
“Oil Slick Breaks Up, Soaks Beaches,” Washington Post, Times Herald, February 11, 1969, p. A-7.
Charles T. Powers, “Uneventful Day: Then Well No. 5 Blew Out,” Los Angeles Times, February 11, 1969, p. 1
Dial Torgerson, “New Shoreward Surge of Oil Feared as Storm Nears Area,” Los Angeles Times, February 12, 1969, p. A3-A4.
“Bird Cleaning,” photograph, Washington Post, Times Herald, February 12, 1969, p. A-7.
“Befouled Grebe Gets a Bath,” photograph, Time, February 14, 1969, p. 25.
“A California Oil Strike Nobody Wanted,” Life, February 14, 1969, pp. 30–31.
“The Great Blob,” Newsweek, February 17, 1969, pp. 31–32.
Robert L. Jackson, “Oil Firms Shielded in Spillage Cases, Senate Aides Say,” Los Angeles Times, February 17, 1969, p. A-1
Dial Torgerson, “Crews Try to Cut Gas Pressure on Oil Leak,” Los Angeles Times, February 18, 1969, p. 3.
Spencer Rich, “Oil Firms Made Liable For Pollution Damages,” Washington Post, Times Herald, February 18, 1969, p. A-1.
Dial Torgerson, “State Starts Action to Obtain $1 Billion in Oil Leak Damage,” Los Angeles Times, February 19, 1969, pp. 3-4.
“The Environment: The Dead Channel,” Time, February 21, 1969.
Lee Dye, “More Oil Ashore; Film Appears Thicker Than First Spillage,” Los Angeles Times, February 27, 1969, p. 1.
UPI, “Congress Urged By Interior Secretary to Toughen Oil Pollution Liability Bill,” The Bulletin (Bend, Oregon), February 28, 1969, p. 5.
UPI, “Hickel Wants More Punch In Oil Bill,” Sarasota Journal (Florida), February 28, 1969.
Spencer Rich, “Hickel Endorses Stricter Oil, Water Controls,” Washington Post, Times Herald, March 1, 1969, pp. A1-A2.
“Udall Admits ‘Overconfidence’ in Granting Ocean Oil Leases,” Los Angeles Times, March 11, 1969, p. A-3.
Spencer Rich, “Udall: Oil Decision a ‘Bay of Pigs’,” Washington Post, Times Herald, March 11, 1969, p. A-4.
Spencer Rich, “Sanctuary Set at Calif. Oil Drilling Site,” Washington Post, Times Herald, March 12, 1969, p. A-4.
AP, “Nixon On Oiled Beach;.Little Of Vast Slick Remains,” Toledo Blade (Toledo, Ohio), March 22, 1969, p. 1.
Press Conference Re: “New Oil Regulations for Offshore Drilling and Production at Santa Barbara, California”, the Honorable Walter Hickel, Secretary, Department of the Interior, Room 1324, Longworth House Office Building, Washington, D.C., Friday, March 21, 1969, 32pp.
Associated Press, “Hickel Issues Oil Rules…For California Coast,” The Daily Illini (Urbana Illinois), March 22, 1969, p. 9.
Jerry Ruhlow, “Sea Life Refuges on Coast Affected by Deluge of Oil,” Los Angeles Times, March 31, 1969, p. D1-D2.
Charles T. Powers, “Ban on Offshore Wells Sought by Santa Barbara,” Los Angeles Times, April 3, 1969, pp. 3-4.
“Santa Barbara County Files Oil Drilling Suit,” Los Angeles Times, April 5, 1969, p. A-13.
John H Averill, “White House Opposes Channel Oil Well Ban,” Los Angeles Times, May 20, 1969, p. 3.
Don Kirkman, “2 Senators Rap Go Ahead on Oil Wells: Muskie, Cranston Assail Report as Unscientific,” The Pittsburgh Press, June 6, 1969.
David Snell, “Iridescent Gift of Death; As the Oil Spill off Santa Barbara Keeps Right on Killing, The Proposal is For All-Out Drilling,” Life (photographs by Harry Benson), June 13, 1969, pp. 22-27.
Spencer Rich, “Hill Action Due On Oil Leaks; Liability of Ships Imposed by Hickel; Local Groups Displeased,” Washington Post, Times Herald, June 23, 1969, p. A-2.
William M. Blair, “Offshore Oil Pacts Face New Hurdles; Offshore Oil Leases Facing New Curbs, With Role for Public in Decisions,” New York Times, June 26, 1969.
Morton Mintz, “Oil Spill ‘Radicalizes’ Staid Coast City,” Washington Post, Times Herald, June 29, 1969, pp. 47-48.
U.S. Department of the Interior / Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, Review of Santa Barbara Channel Oil Pollution Incident (by Battelle Northwest, Richland Washington), July 18, 1969.
Dennis M. O’Connell, “Continental Shelf Oil Disasters; Challenge to International Pollution Control,” 55 Cornell Law Review, 113 (1969).
Associated Press, “Santa Barbara Is Still Boiling Over Oil Well,” Reading Eagle (Reading, PA), November 23, 1969.
“Walter Hickel on the Santa Barbara Channel Oil Spill,” News Conference, KPIX-TV Eyewitness News Report (video), October 1969, via San Francisco Bay Area Television Archive.
Ross MacDonald and Robert Easton, “Thou Shalt Not Abuse the Earth,” New York Times Magazine, October 12, 1969, p. 32 (MacDonald and Easton were then co-founders of the Santa Barbara Citizens for Environmental Defense).
“Floating Rig Sinks; Nixon Asked To Halt Coastal Drilling,”Toledo Blade (Toledo, OH), November 23, 1969, p. 9.
Harvey Molotch (University of California, Santa Barbara), “Oil in Santa Barbara and Power in America,” Sociological Inquiry, 40 (Winter), 1969, pp. 131-144.
“Oil Leases,” CQ Almanac 1969, 25th ed., Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1970, p. 522.
Bob Duncan, Photo Gallery, “Santa Barbara Oil Spill, 1969,” Flickr.com.
W. Gerber, “Coastal Conservation,” CQ Researcher (Editorial Research Reports), February 25, 1970, Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly/CQ Press.
“Nixon Urged To Bar New Oil Platform,” Washington Post, Times Herald, January 2, 1970, p. A-3.
Gladwin Hill, “One Year Later, Impact of Great Oil Slick Is Still Felt,” New York Times, January 25, 1970.
“Nixon Seeks Oil Spill Area As Sanctuary; Nixon Would Void Oil Leases Off Santa Barbara,” Washington Post, Times Herald, June 12, 1970, p. A-1.
“Environment: Good News for Santa Barbara,” Time, June 22, 1970.
Philip D. Carter, “Stringent Oil Spill Rules Set; Stringent New Oil Spill Regulations Are Issued by Interior Department,” Washington Post, Times Herald, July 25, 1970, p. A-1.
Lee Dye, Blowout at Platform A: The Crisis That Awakened a Nation, New York: Doubleday, 1971, 231 pp.
New York Times News Service, “Interior Asks Resumption Of Santa Barbara Oil,” St. Petersburg Times (Florida), September 3, 1971, p. 4-A.
L.A. Times News Service, “2 More Oil Platforms Given Nod “[‘Platform C’ and ‘Henry’], Sarasota Herald-Tribune (Sarasota, Florida) September 3, 1971.
Robert Easton, Black Tide: The Santa Barbara Oil Spill and its Consequences, New York, NY: Delacorte Press, 1972.
Carol and John Steinhart, Walter Hickel (Foreword), Blowout: A Case Study of the Santa Barbara Oil Spill, Duxbury/ Wadsworth, Belmont, California, 1972, 138 pp.
John C. Whitaker (Nixon’s Cabinet Secretary in 1969, and associate director of the White House Domestic Council for environment, energy, and natural resources policy, 1969-1972), “Earth Day Recollections: What It Was Like When The Movement Took Off,” EPA Journal, July/August 1988.
President Richard M. Nixon, “Special Message to the Congress Outlining the 1972 Environmental Program,” February 8, 1972.
A. E. Keir Nash, Dean E. Mann, Phil G. Olsen, Oil Pollution and the Public Interest: A Study of the Santa Barbara Oil Spill, Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley, October 1972, 136pp.
Nancy I. Nicholson, University of Southern California, “The Santa Barbara Oil Spills in Perspective,” California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations, Reports Volume XVI, 1972, pp. 130-149.
James Rathelsberger (ed.), Nixon and The Environment: The Politics of Devastation, Village Voice, 1972.
Nick Welsh, “The Big Spill,” Santa Barbara News-Press, January 26, 1989.
Miles Corwin, “1969 Santa Barbara Oil Spill,” Los Angeles Times, January 28, 1989.
Keith C. Clarke and Jeffrey J. Hemphill, “The Santa Barbara Oil Spill, A Retrospective,” in Darrick Danta (ed.), Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers, University of Hawaii Press, 2002, vol. 64, pp. 157-162.
“Interview with Walter J. Hickel,” Center of The American West, Boulder, Colorado, October 15, 2003.
dsteffen, “How Regulation Came to Be: Santa Barbara,” DailyKos.com, Sunday Jan 24, 2010.
Sarah Gardner, “Reporter’s Notebook: Lessons from the Santa Barbara Oil Spill,” Marketplace.org, June 25, 2010 (with photos).
Rob Reynolds, “Santa Barbara: The Spill That Energized a Movement,” CommonDreams .org, June 7, 2010.
Associated Press, “Gulf Spill Lacks Transformational Punch of 1969 Santa Barbara Oil Spill,” FoxNews.com, July 29, 2010.
Cindy Wu, “The Santa Barbara Disaster of 1969: A Turning Point for American Environmentalism.”
Matt Dozier, National Marine Sanctuaries’ Office of Response and Restoration, NOAA, “National Marine Sanctuaries: How a Disaster Changed the Face of Ocean Conservation,” October 26, 2012.
Erwin Mauricio Escobar, “Nixon and the Environment: Clean Air, Automobiles and Reelection,” A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, May 2013.
“January 28, 1969: An Ecological Disaster and Impetus For a New Ethos,” Friends of Cal Archives.org, January 28, 2014.
“45 Years After the Santa Barbara Oil Spill, Looking at a Historic Disaster Through Technology,” National Marine Sanctuaries’ Office of Response and Restoration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce, January 28, 2014.
Alan Neuhauser, “Oil Spills Aplenty Since Exxon Valdez; Storms, Ship Collisions, Pipeline Ruptures and Explosions Have Spilled Millions of Gallons of Oil Across the United States,” U.S. News, March 25, 2014.
Ari Phillips, “How A Massive Oil Spill in 1969 Changed Everything,” ThinkProgress.org, June 30, 2014.
Christine Mai-Duc, “The 1969 Santa Barbara Oil Spill That Changed Oil and Gas Exploration Forever,” Los Angeles Times, May 20, 2015.
Francie Diep, “What Can the 1969 Santa Barbara Oil Spill Teach Us About Animal Life? History — and Science—have a Lot to Teach Us Here in Santa Barbara, California,” Pacific Standard, May 26, 2015.
“Santa Barbara Oil Spill: From 1969 to 2015,” EdHat.com (Santa Barbara, CA), May 23, 2015.
Staff Working Paper No. 11, “A Brief History of Offshore Oil Drilling” (draft), National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, no date, 18pp.